Question 1 — Charter Change
OFFICIAL TEXT
Issued by the Charter Revision Commission.
Should the changes to the City Charter, as proposed
by the Charter Revision Commission, be adopted? Among these changes are:
- creating “gun free” school safety zones
within 1000 feet of every school in the City, and requiring people purchasing
or obtaining firearms to purchase or obtain safety locks for all firearms
and to use safety locks when storing all firearms;
- creating a budget stabilization and emergency fund
out of City surpluses to fund emergency needs or other needs as determined
jointly by the Mayor and the City Council and, if not spent, to prepay
debt; limiting City government spending increases generally to the rate
of inflation; and requiring a two-thirds vote of the City Council, instead
of a simple majority, to increase taxes or impose new taxes;
- establishing the Commission on Human Rights as
a Charter agency to protect civil rights;
- protecting immigrants’ rights to access City services,
and establishing the Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs and Language Services
as a Charter agency;
- effective as of January 1, 2002, requiring a special
election within 60 days of a mayoral vacancy, requiring a run-off if no
candidate receives at least 40 percent of the vote in a special election
to fill a vacancy for Mayor, Public Advocate or Comptroller, and eliminating
the Charter language that the Public Advocate “shall preside over
the meetings of the [City] Council”;
- simplifying the City’s procedures for awarding
contracts and centralizing vendor integrity review; and
- reorganizing City government to establish the Administration
for Children’s Services as an independent agency, to form an Organized
Crime Control Commission, to consolidate City agencies to create a Department
of Public Health and Mental Hygiene Services, and to require executive
coordination of City services to prevent domestic violence.
Introduction
Official Text
Official Summary
History and Description
Highlights of the Major Arguments
Pro and Con Statements Received from the Public
New York State Ballot Proposal
|